weapons of mass destruction
n 1. any weapon which could potentially inflict fatalities and physical
damage on a massive scale. 2. polit. the nuclear, biological
and chemical (NBC) arsenals of states identified as belonging to the axis
of evil. also abbrv. as WMD. CURRENT
USAGE: "These [UN] reports do not contend that weapons of mass destruction
remain in Iraq, but nor do they exclude that possibility." Dr Hans Blix's statement
to the UN Security Council - 27/01/03.
ORIGIN:
British newspapers called bomber aircraft "weapons of mass destruction" in 1937,
when the Nazi Luftwaffe was flattening towns - such as Guernica - during the Spanish
Civil War.
In the arms race of the Cold War, WMD
was exclusively applied to thermo-nuclear bombs - since the opposing sides were
ready with enough nukes to mutually assure the destruction of, well, everything.
BROADENED DEFINITION: UN Resolution 687 -
which ended the Gulf War in 1991 - called on Iraq to relinquish its NBC ambitions
and summed up the unpleasant trio as WMD.
In 1998,
US law formalised WMD as devices able "to cause death or serious bodily injury
to a significant number of people" using chemicals, a disease organism,
radiation or radioactivity.
DISPUTED
DEFINITION: the FBI says conventional explosives can also be WMD. "A weapon
crosses the WMD threshold when the consequences of its release overwhelm local
responders."
DISPUTED DEFINITION (TWO): Colombia's
Vice President Gustavo Bell Lemus told the UN that small arms are also WMD, because
bullet fatalities "dwarf that of all other weapons systems - and in most years
greatly exceed the toll of the atomic bombs that devastated Hiroshima and Nagasaki".
DISPUTED DEFINITION (THREE): some say that
fewer - rather than more - weapons should be deemed capable of mass destruction.
"Only nuclear weapons are completely indiscriminate
by their explosive power, heat radiation and radioactivity, and only they should
therefore be called a weapon of mass destruction" says chemical weapons expert
Gert G Harigel.
ALTERNATIVES: Mr Harigel
prefers to call clouds of anthrax or poison gas or radioactive dust "weapons
of terror" when aimed against civilians and "weapons of intimidation"
for soldiers in gas masks and protective suits.
"Weapons
of indiscriminate destruction", "weapons of mass disruption" and "weapons
of catastrophic effect" have also been suggested.
MASS
USE: WMD has had a mass impact of its own. Its recent ubiquity has earned
it a place on Lake Superior State University's famed list of "misused, overused
and generally uselessness" words.